I dropped the ink limit down max (-50). I increased the gamma a bit
to try to keep the midtones a little darker, based on some tests I
had made. I've just started monkeying around with the ink limit and
gammas, so I may have it all wrong. I spent most of Saturday trying
to make my own curve, and got pretty frustrated (tried to modify a H
Photo Rag curve off a website), and gave up after seeing that 1440
gave me a closer print to the monitor. Then when printing bigger
prints I find that the 1440 gave me banding. Lots of ink, lots of
paper, lots of frustration. But at least now I have a decent large
print, and a slightly better understanding. I'll continue to work
on the curve. If anyone has a modified curve for 2880 and HPR or
EEM, I'd be grateful. All the stock curves in QTR print really dark
for me (2200).
Thanks for the help.
--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Howard Shaw <glassman@...> wrote:
>
> Mason_Reid wrote:
> > The banding is about 1/2 inch, regularly spaced, and pretty
subtle.
> > They occur primarily on the first half of the print in (blue)sky
> > areas. I changed to 2880, dropped the ink limit, raised the
gamma,
> > and I got a good print. 2880 prints are considerably darker than
> > 1440. And the banding is only noticeable on larger (9x19in)
prints,
> > which is what I'm selling. Smaller proofs don't show the
banding.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> More ink is deposited at 2880dpi so you'll need to reduce the ink
limit
> by 40-50%. You shouldn't need to change the gamma. Preferably you
should
> make new curves.
>
> Does the banding actually disappear at 2880dpi? I had a similar
problem
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> but with horizontal banding and never managed to fix it so now I
> restrict myself to 2880dpi.
>
> Howard
>