Interesting idea. Could you elaborate on your workflow for selecting and whitening the pixels 30%, and maybe post a sample image?
Here's what I tried. In a 360 dpi test image, I did Select all > Select > Modify border > 20 pixels > and used the regular noise filter at 75% to create a jagged edge. This reduced banding somewhat, compared to an identical printout without the added noise, but didn't eliminate it. I also tried 25% and 100% noise but 75% worked best.
My testing used EEM with the EEM neutral profile, printed at 1440 (better) on a 1280 with UT2 inks. I haven't found 2880 to make a significant difference with respect to banding and I'm reluctant to use all that extra ink, since I make very large prints.
Mark
--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "koloshor" ; wrote:
>
> --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "oksen" oksen@ wrote:
> >
> > I'm getting slight banding especially in the both ends on a A6
> > landscape print on epson matte HW. I have tried a lot of combinations
> > including increasing shadow darkness and gamma with no result. I print
> > in 2800dpi as 1440dpi results in even more banding. Same image printed
> > in Photoshop at the same time has absolutely no banding, so it must be
> > related to the rip. On semigloss I had the same problme plus the ink
> > never dries, so that's why I now go for the matte paper.
> > Any suggestion highly appreciated, as this RIP seems to be able to get
> > rid of the colorcast produced by photoshop on the 1800.
>; > thanks in advance,
>
> One banding "cure" for QTR that works well for me is to add a "micro
> jaggie" border to your print. The dither in the version of the GIMP
> print engine used in QTR doesn't deal with uniform areas well. If you
> randomly make about 1/3 the pixels on all four edges of the image
> white, the dither settles down remarkably well. Your original image
> has to be at least 300dpi when you do this, or you're going to see
> "teeth" around the edges.
>