Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Thread

Why using QuadToneRIP?

Why using QuadToneRIP?

2006-06-24 by Steven

Hello,

I have discovered QTR on the web and read many positive stories about
it for making great B/W photos. Here is my question: why buy and use
QTR if i can use the advanced B/W print option in the epson R2400
driver which give me exellent results? What are the differences
between the RIP and the epson utility? Can i expect even more better
results with the RIP?
I hope someone can help me with these questions.
thanks, Steven.

Re: Why using QuadToneRIP?

2006-06-24 by deisenlord

In printing sepia prints, I got color color cross overs when using the
2400 and ABW.  In building my own sepia profile w/ QTR I was able to
eliminate these.
Dave


--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Steven" <X5682pdb00@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hello,
> 
> I have discovered QTR on the web and read many positive stories about
> it for making great B/W photos. Here is my question: why buy and use
> QTR if i can use the advanced B/W print option in the epson R2400
> driver which give me exellent results? What are the differences
> between the RIP and the epson utility? Can i expect even more better
> results with the RIP?
> I hope someone can help me with these questions.
> thanks, Steven.
>

RE: [QuadtoneRIP] Why using QuadToneRIP?

2006-06-24 by Stephen Billard

Given your statement that you get excellent results with what you have, Don't
buy QTR. If you are curious, though, you can just download QTR and give it a
try. You only pay for it if it fits your needs. 


-Stephen
 www.sbillard.org/Stephen
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 3:48 AM
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Why using QuadToneRIP?

Hello,

I have discovered QTR on the web and read many positive stories about it for
making great B/W photos. Here is my question: why buy and use QTR if i can use
the advanced B/W print option in the epson R2400 driver which give me exellent
results? What are the differences between the RIP and the epson utility? Can i
expect even more better results with the RIP?
I hope someone can help me with these questions.
thanks, Steven.

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Why using QuadToneRIP?

2006-07-18 by James Haney

Personally I still find that I get smoother tones in the high lights 
with a quadtone inkset.

I use Piezotone in a 7600. This gives me solid black and three toned 
inks of varying density.

I use three Carbon Sepia inks and three Selenium inks and can blend 
between the two sets.

Having four densities of grey versus the three of the K3 inkset gives 
me better hilight definition.

The variation is minimal but I prefer the Piezo inks.

James Haney
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Jun 24, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Stephen Billard wrote:

> Given your statement that you get excellent results with what you 
> have, Don't
>  buy QTR. If you are curious, though, you can just download QTR and 
> give it a
>  try. You only pay for it if it fits your needs.
>
>  -Stephen
>  www.sbillard.org/Stephen
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
>  Of Steven
>  Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 3:48 AM
>  To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
>  Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Why using QuadToneRIP?
>
>  Hello,
>
>  I have discovered QTR on the web and read many positive stories about 
> it for
>  making great B/W photos. Here is my question: why buy and use QTR if 
> i can use
>  the advanced B/W print option in the epson R2400 driver which give me 
> exellent
>  results? What are the differences between the RIP and the epson 
> utility? Can i
>  expect even more better results with the RIP?
>  I hope someone can help me with these questions.
>  thanks, Steven.
>
>  
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.