Many thanks again Tom!!
I'll give it some thought as I do color work as well. I'm using an
R1800 printer and my monitor has been calibrated with the Monaco
Optix XR puck. I've had pretty good color matching between my
monitor and Epson OEM inks and Premium Glossy paper. EXCEPT for
yellow. I've used the Epson supplied profiles as well as some
profiles I made myself using one of the simple Monaco profiling tools
and they come out the same. Too much magenta in the yellows.
So maybe Printfix Pro is worth considering.
Mike
--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Moore" <r.t.moore@...> wrote:
>
> Mike
>
> I bought the printfixpro suite on Ebay for around $550. That
included the
> spyder II monitor calibration. I don't see any units on ebay right
now.
>
> The 810 is definitely cheaper. As always, it's a cost benefit
tradeoff. With
> the 810, only the visual density readings are useful for digital
printing.
> It can read so-called Status A RGB values, but there is no
conversion
> available from these to, for example, LAB. With printfix you get
the density
> measurement PLUS you get colour. That means, for example you can
prepare ICC
> files that will give you a complete softproof of your toned QTR
images, you
> can prepare ICC profiles for 3rd party inks for colour printing,
and most
> interesting to me, you can create ICC for printing with reduced
gamut
> inksets like Paul Roark's UT3D inks. I haven't tried this last one
yet.
>
> By the way, I realize this sounds a little too enthusiastic. I have
no
> personal interest in printfixpro. I just happen to own one. If all
you want
> to do is make QTR curves, the 810 will do fine and is not a big
investment.
> They're built like tanks and, so far, xrite continues to provide
parts like
> bulbs and calibration paques.
>
> With respet to the readings, the printfix spectro reads LAB values.
QTR can
> use L values as well as density values so they don't have to be
converted.
> If you want to know the densities the L can be converted to density.
> Although David Tobie states that there is no "formal" conversion
from L* to
> density, there are several sources on the web for the conversion
math,
> including a spreadsheet that I created and placed in the files
section of
> the QTR mailing list. Formal or not, the conversions were useful to
me.
>
> Tom Moore
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On
> > Behalf Of Mike Dawson
> > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:54 PM
> > To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: X-Rite 810 densitometer
> >
> > Thanks for the response Tom.
> >
> > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Moore" <r.t.moore@>
wrote:
> > >
> > > If you get a unit without calibration plate you can buy one from
> > xrite. I
> > > don't remember the price other than they're fairly expensive.
The
> > reflective
> > > calibration plates are metal with what looks like an enamel
> > surface. They
> > > have a data sheet giving their measurement values used in the
> > calibration
> >
> > The reflective calibration target looks to be about $70 from
xrite.
> > I guess I'd need to weigh out the value of an 810 that came with
the
> > calibration target but out of date vs. just buying a new target.
> >
> > > As a more flexible alternative buying an 810 and a patch, you
might
> > want to
> > > consider the PrintfixPRO package. It does everything the 810
does
> > as far as
> > > supporting QTR is concerned, plus it also measures colour,
creates
> > ICCs for
> > > colour ink sets and calibrates your monitor too. Of course
PrintFIX
> > doesn't
> > > do transmission densitometry.
> > >
> >
> > Interesting suggestion. The issue I see is that the PrintfixPro
> > package is $500. If I can get a used 810 for around $130 plus $70
> > for a new target that's only $200. But as you say, you're
getting a
> > lot more with PrintfixPro.
> >
> > As far as QTR goes can you give an indication of how you use the
> > spectrophotometer? I assume you can use the spectrophotometer
> > outside of the PrintfixPro software package? When doing so are
you
> > measuring the L values of the gray patches (as opposed to the
density
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > readings of the densitometer)?
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>