QTR vs. IJC/OPM ???
2008-01-05 by evanj1969
I also posted this question on the "Digital BW, The Print" in hopes that someone can offer help. can anyone comment on this? I am looking at "possibly" purchasing an Epson 3800 as opposed to a R2400. the only issues that concerns me are this, the 3800 has no 3rd party carts available at this time and may never, AND QTR is the only available option (aside from ABW and expensive RIP's) . I have used both IJC/OPM and QTR, and find IJC to be easier to manipulate. I could get my curves set very easily and PRECISELY with IJC. I had much more trouble getting QTR where I wanted them. I could get my curves set EXACTLY as I wanted them, due to the graphical interface, and it functioning similar to Photoshop (or at least the curve interface) my question is: can QTR be manipulated to the same degree as IJC. with IJC's interface, I could easily set my LM (or any color) to a VERY specific level, and adjust any part of LM curve to a very fine degree. I could adjust my LM/LC/ LLK (or whatever color or jet) with great detail anywhere along that curve. I somewhat gave up on QTR at that time. probably due to the fact that I tend to work more visually, and QTR causes you to think about vs."see" what your doing. don't misunderstand, I'm not criticizing QTR, I think it's a great program, I just felt IJC offered more control of the ink values across the entire range. am I mistaken on that issue? can QTR offer the same amount of control but with more effort on my behalf???? if I can give me the control I had with IJC (not available for the 3800), I very well might purchase one. I would appreciate anyone with experience with the two commenting. thanks to all even