Recommended workflow, 1290 using UT2 inks
2011-05-10 by Mel
I cannot find any information on the forum with regard to this. I would like to know the suggested workflow using Photo and Eboni black and replacement of the yellow with GLOP.
Thread
Recommended workflow, 1290 using UT2 inks
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Recommended workflow, 1290 using UT2 inks
2011-05-10 by edward wiseman
Mel.. From personal experience (3-4 1280's), the results with UT-2 inks was superb, EXCEPT that these inks will clog and finally kill-off your 12xx machine..I heartily recommend that you find a 1400 ( or 1410) on sale and go with the UT-14 inks..I've been using this setup for almost three years without a hitch..You will save money in the long run and be at peace printing!.. Good Luck whatever you decide.. Eddie
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: Mel
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:55 PM
Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Recommended workflow, 1290 using UT2 inks
I cannot find any information on the forum with regard to this.
I would like to know the suggested workflow using Photo and Eboni black and replacement of the yellow with GLOP.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Recommended workflow, 1290 using UT2 inks
2011-05-10 by edward wiseman
Mel.. Just in case you MUST go with UT-2..Here's a link to what you were looking for: http://www.inksupply.com/ut2-1280.cfm Read it ALL The way DOWN.. Eddie
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: edward wiseman
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Recommended workflow, 1290 using UT2 inks
Mel..
From personal experience (3-4 1280's), the results with UT-2 inks was superb, EXCEPT that these inks will clog and finally kill-off your 12xx machine..I heartily recommend that you find a 1400 ( or 1410) on sale and go with the UT-14 inks..I've been using this setup for almost three years without a hitch..You will save money in the long run and be at peace printing!..
Good Luck whatever you decide..
Eddie
----- Original Message -----
From: Mel
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:55 PM
Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Recommended workflow, 1290 using UT2 inks
I cannot find any information on the forum with regard to this.
I would like to know the suggested workflow using Photo and Eboni black and replacement of the yellow with GLOP.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Re: Recommended workflow, 1290 using UT2 inks
2011-05-11 by Mel
Thanks Eddie for your replies - I find this a little worrying and will ask MIS for their comments re clogging. Mel --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "edward wiseman" <pahts@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > Mel.. > Just in case you MUST go with UT-2..Here's a link to what you were looking for: > http://www.inksupply.com/ut2-1280.cfm Read it ALL The way DOWN.. > > Eddie > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: edward wiseman > To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 3:24 PM > Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Recommended workflow, 1290 using UT2 inks > > > > Mel.. > > From personal experience (3-4 1280's), the results with UT-2 inks was superb, EXCEPT that these inks will clog and finally kill-off your 12xx machine..I heartily recommend that you find a 1400 ( or 1410) on sale and go with the UT-14 inks..I've been using this setup for almost three years without a hitch..You will save money in the long run and be at peace printing!.. > > Good Luck whatever you decide.. > > Eddie > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mel > To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:55 PM > Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Recommended workflow, 1290 using UT2 inks > > I cannot find any information on the forum with regard to this. > > I would like to know the suggested workflow using Photo and Eboni black and replacement of the yellow with GLOP. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >