xfade is for audio (AC coupled), the active processor is for DC control
voltages.
You could use xfade as an audio switcher, near the end of your signal
chain, instead of using it for CV, and accomplish the same thing. Maybe
you'd need twice the oscillators though.
voltages.
You could use xfade as an audio switcher, near the end of your signal
chain, instead of using it for CV, and accomplish the same thing. Maybe
you'd need twice the oscillators though.
>The xfade adds lag to the signals. I didn't realize this. Are these designed
>for audio and have caps to drop any DC offset? That would explain the lag.
>Still, it might do in a pinch.
>
>James R. Coplin
>***************
>If anyone asks of my whereabouts,
>simply tell them i've gone out the window
>for a spot of tea and am not
>expected back any time soon.
>***************
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: john duval [mailto:darkstr717@...]
>>Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 12:09 AM
>>To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [SergeModular] Seq and Sync
>>
>>
>>
>>Your missing the point. there is no stopping "A" and
>>starting"B"... they ALL run concurrently. You might be
>>able to simulate the same effect by having whatever
>>vca is responsible for the output of the voice that
>>row A is driving to attenuate after the first pass of
>>the sequence... also attenuates row B output vca for
>>that voice while row A runs..... then switches that
>>vca while bringing up same vca for row B when the
>>sequencer makes another pass. Hmmmm... ? now there's a
>>patch i'd like to see. LOL. I'm not sure how you would
>>do this... a Shmidt Trigger?? Do you see what i mean??
>>all the rows run at the same time.. it's just a matter
>>of controling the VCAs that control the output of the
>>respective rows voice.
>>This sounds like a job for one of Grenaders Event
>>Triggers.
>>I'd give this some energy but for the fact that i'm
>>trying to figure out how to use the DSG as a filter.
>>I've heard that it is good for taking the "buzz" out
>>of sounds so that they sound smooth.... or
>>smoother.Anyway, i put up a patch last night to work
>>on this and when i got done i had a veritable pasta
>>fest going on that was so far from the original intent
>>that it became something else entirley. oh well.
>> kind regards
>> john duval
>>
>>
>>--- Ioannis Kazlaris <ikazlar@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>OK, lets say that row A outputs values a1, a2, a3,
>>>and a4 (a1, a2, a3 < a4). If I feed the A output to
>>>a comparator with its value set to a4 + 1 and then
>>>to a XOR that also has its output to row B, I
>>>suppose then that an inverted signal from the XOR
>>>would stop A and start B. I really think that by
>>>using some boolean logic to the party it might
>>>happen. Have I got this wrong?
>>>
>>>For hard sync, I suppose that any waveform that sees
>>>a sharp transient modulating its pitch would be
>>>forced to restart. Isn't this after all, the nature
>>>of synchronization? Now wonder why you can't sync
>>>sines. There's not a sharp thing anywhere.
>>>
>>>Rex send me some stuff and .... God how bad I want
>>>one...
>>>
>>>Yannis
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------
>>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>>Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>__________________________________
>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
>>http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
>>
>>
>>
>>Keep on Patchin'!
>>
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Keep on Patchin'!
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>