SergeModular

>
> Hi,
>
> OK, lets say that row A outputs values a1, a2, a3,
> and a4 (a1, a2, a3 < a4). If I feed the A output to
> a comparator with its value set to a4 + 1 and then
> to a XOR that also has its output to row B, I
> suppose then that an inverted signal from the XOR
> would stop A and start B. I really think that by
> using some boolean logic to the party it might
> happen. Have I got this wrong?
>
> For hard sync, I suppose that any waveform that sees
> a sharp transient modulating its pitch would be
> forced to restart. Isn't this after all, the nature
> of synchronization? Now wonder why you can't sync
> sines. There's not a sharp thing anywhere.
>
> Rex send me some stuff and .... God how bad I want
> one...
>
> Yannis
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs

> -----Original Message-----
> From: john duval [mailto:darkstr717@...]
> Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 12:09 AM
> To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [SergeModular] Seq and Sync
>
>
>
> Your missing the point. there is no stopping "A" and
> starting"B"... they ALL run concurrently. You might be
> able to simulate the same effect by having whatever
> vca is responsible for the output of the voice that
> row A is driving to attenuate after the first pass of
> the sequence... also attenuates row B output vca for
> that voice while row A runs..... then switches that
> vca while bringing up same vca for row B when the
> sequencer makes another pass. Hmmmm... ? now there's a
> patch i'd like to see. LOL. I'm not sure how you would
> do this... a Shmidt Trigger?? Do you see what i mean??
> all the rows run at the same time.. it's just a matter
> of controling the VCAs that control the output of the
> respective rows voice.
> This sounds like a job for one of Grenaders Event
> Triggers.
> I'd give this some energy but for the fact that i'm
> trying to figure out how to use the DSG as a filter.
> I've heard that it is good for taking the "buzz" out
> of sounds so that they sound smooth.... or
> smoother.Anyway, i put up a patch last night to work
> on this and when i got done i had a veritable pasta
> fest going on that was so far from the original intent
> that it became something else entirley. oh well.
> kind regards
> john duval
>
>
> --- Ioannis Kazlaris <ikazlar@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > OK, lets say that row A outputs values a1, a2, a3,
> > and a4 (a1, a2, a3 < a4). If I feed the A output to
> > a comparator with its value set to a4 + 1 and then
> > to a XOR that also has its output to row B, I
> > suppose then that an inverted signal from the XOR
> > would stop A and start B. I really think that by
> > using some boolean logic to the party it might
> > happen. Have I got this wrong?
> >
> > For hard sync, I suppose that any waveform that sees
> > a sharp transient modulating its pitch would be
> > forced to restart. Isn't this after all, the nature
> > of synchronization? Now wonder why you can't sync
> > sines. There's not a sharp thing anywhere.
> >
> > Rex send me some stuff and .... God how bad I want
> > one...
> >
> > Yannis
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
>
>
>
> Keep on Patchin'!
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

>The xfade adds lag to the signals. I didn't realize this. Are these designed
>for audio and have caps to drop any DC offset? That would explain the lag.
>Still, it might do in a pinch.
>
>James R. Coplin
>***************
>If anyone asks of my whereabouts,
>simply tell them i've gone out the window
>for a spot of tea and am not
>expected back any time soon.
>***************
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: john duval [mailto:darkstr717@...]
>>Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 12:09 AM
>>To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [SergeModular] Seq and Sync
>>
>>
>>
>>Your missing the point. there is no stopping "A" and
>>starting"B"... they ALL run concurrently. You might be
>>able to simulate the same effect by having whatever
>>vca is responsible for the output of the voice that
>>row A is driving to attenuate after the first pass of
>>the sequence... also attenuates row B output vca for
>>that voice while row A runs..... then switches that
>>vca while bringing up same vca for row B when the
>>sequencer makes another pass. Hmmmm... ? now there's a
>>patch i'd like to see. LOL. I'm not sure how you would
>>do this... a Shmidt Trigger?? Do you see what i mean??
>>all the rows run at the same time.. it's just a matter
>>of controling the VCAs that control the output of the
>>respective rows voice.
>>This sounds like a job for one of Grenaders Event
>>Triggers.
>>I'd give this some energy but for the fact that i'm
>>trying to figure out how to use the DSG as a filter.
>>I've heard that it is good for taking the "buzz" out
>>of sounds so that they sound smooth.... or
>>smoother.Anyway, i put up a patch last night to work
>>on this and when i got done i had a veritable pasta
>>fest going on that was so far from the original intent
>>that it became something else entirley. oh well.
>> kind regards
>> john duval
>>
>>
>>--- Ioannis Kazlaris <ikazlar@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>OK, lets say that row A outputs values a1, a2, a3,
>>>and a4 (a1, a2, a3 < a4). If I feed the A output to
>>>a comparator with its value set to a4 + 1 and then
>>>to a XOR that also has its output to row B, I
>>>suppose then that an inverted signal from the XOR
>>>would stop A and start B. I really think that by
>>>using some boolean logic to the party it might
>>>happen. Have I got this wrong?
>>>
>>>For hard sync, I suppose that any waveform that sees
>>>a sharp transient modulating its pitch would be
>>>forced to restart. Isn't this after all, the nature
>>>of synchronization? Now wonder why you can't sync
>>>sines. There's not a sharp thing anywhere.
>>>
>>>Rex send me some stuff and .... God how bad I want
>>>one...
>>>
>>>Yannis
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------
>>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>>Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>__________________________________
>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
>>http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
>>
>>
>>
>>Keep on Patchin'!
>>
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Keep on Patchin'!
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> xfade is for audio (AC coupled), the active
> processor is for DC control
> voltages.
> You could use xfade as an audio switcher, near the
> end of your signal
> chain, instead of using it for CV, and accomplish
> the same thing. Maybe
> you'd need twice the oscillators though.
>
> >The xfade adds lag to the signals. I didn't realize
> this. Are these designed
> >for audio and have caps to drop any DC offset? That
> would explain the lag.
> >Still, it might do in a pinch.
> >
> >James R. Coplin
> >***************
> >If anyone asks of my whereabouts,
> >simply tell them i've gone out the window
> >for a spot of tea and am not
> >expected back any time soon.
> >***************
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: john duval [mailto:darkstr717@...]
> >>Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 12:09 AM
> >>To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
> >>Subject: Re: [SergeModular] Seq and Sync
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Your missing the point. there is no stopping "A"
> and
> >>starting"B"... they ALL run concurrently. You
> might be
> >>able to simulate the same effect by having
> whatever
> >>vca is responsible for the output of the voice
> that
> >>row A is driving to attenuate after the first pass
> of
> >>the sequence... also attenuates row B output vca
> for
> >>that voice while row A runs..... then switches
> that
> >>vca while bringing up same vca for row B when the
> >>sequencer makes another pass. Hmmmm... ? now
> there's a
> >>patch i'd like to see. LOL. I'm not sure how you
> would
> >>do this... a Shmidt Trigger?? Do you see what i
> mean??
> >>all the rows run at the same time.. it's just a
> matter
> >>of controling the VCAs that control the output of
> the
> >>respective rows voice.
> >>This sounds like a job for one of Grenaders Event
> >>Triggers.
> >>I'd give this some energy but for the fact that
> i'm
> >>trying to figure out how to use the DSG as a
> filter.
> >>I've heard that it is good for taking the "buzz"
> out
> >>of sounds so that they sound smooth.... or
> >>smoother.Anyway, i put up a patch last night to
> work
> >>on this and when i got done i had a veritable
> pasta
> >>fest going on that was so far from the original
> intent
> >>that it became something else entirley. oh well.
> >> kind regards
> >> john duval
> >>
> >>
> >>--- Ioannis Kazlaris <ikazlar@...> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>OK, lets say that row A outputs values a1, a2,
> a3,
> >>>and a4 (a1, a2, a3 < a4). If I feed the A output
> to
> >>>a comparator with its value set to a4 + 1 and
> then
> >>>to a XOR that also has its output to row B, I
> >>>suppose then that an inverted signal from the XOR
> >>>would stop A and start B. I really think that by
> >>>using some boolean logic to the party it might
> >>>happen. Have I got this wrong?
> >>>
> >>>For hard sync, I suppose that any waveform that
> sees
> >>>a sharp transient modulating its pitch would be
> >>>forced to restart. Isn't this after all, the
> nature
> >>>of synchronization? Now wonder why you can't sync
> >>>sines. There's not a sharp thing anywhere.
> >>>
> >>>Rex send me some stuff and .... God how bad I
> want
> >>>one...
> >>>
> >>>Yannis
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>---------------------------------
> >>>Do you Yahoo!?
> >>>Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>__________________________________
> >>Do you Yahoo!?
> >>Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
>
>>http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Keep on Patchin'!
> >>
> >>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Keep on Patchin'!
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>