SergeModular

--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "matthew carpenter"
<matfhew.carpenfer@...> wrote:

> My current config, for anyone who wishes to comment:
>
> NTO / PCO / VCM / AMX (w/ phase switch) / SSG w/ noise / DTG (w/
> sig ins) / VCFQ(X) / UAP
>
> BUFF / SCPR / ACPR / ADSR / ADSR / VCF2 / MIX2 / VCFQ(X) / EQ
>
> NTO / TWS / RING / NCOM / ACPR / 2RVG / DTG / VCFS / 2PHA
>
> I will certainly add a sequencer and/or TKB in the future so this
> last custom panel is meant to cover some territory I don't have
> covered, already:
>
> PRNV / CM / FRS(X) / QUO(?) / XFAD / WAD / BUFF / AMX / VCM / DCSM
>
> I already have a VCM so I'm not sure about that one. But you can't
> get one anywhere else and I'd hate to buy a Soup Kitchen just for
> a VCM. Anyway, that's my idea. Looks like a Soup Kitchen but I
> already have a 2PHA and I'm thinking of going for the ext. carrier
> version of the Frequency Shifter, which it doesn't seem like
> either of the SK's use. So, the VCM and QUO spots are up for
> grabs, pretty much, and IMO, you can't have enough scaling buffers
> or mixers.

I've ranted before about the usefulness of the QUO so I won't repeat
that here (search the archives) other than to say that IMHO its spot
should NOT be up for grabs!

As for the BUFF, I won't disagree with its inclusion, but the panel
location seems a bit awkward to me as I find them more useful at or
near the ends of panels. I wholeheartedly agree with the DCSM given
the size of your system and modules like the Dual Phasers. I really
like the UAP/DCSM combo for flexible output mixing. The second VCM
seems a reasonable choice unless you would rather have another EQ
for stereo processing.

Best wishes,

Chris