Yep, 16" is what we have to work with. It definitely encourages some creative and strenuous thought when planning the panel.
Have you finalized what yours will be? I'm still trying to decide on the last 1 or 2 inches. I would certainly get the Matrix Mixer if I could but that's 4"!
Have you finalized what yours will be? I'm still trying to decide on the last 1 or 2 inches. I would certainly get the Matrix Mixer if I could but that's 4"!
On 6/1/07, Kim Hansen <kimgh@...> wrote:Matthew,
I'd certainly like to have the two other serge vcf's but as we all know
16" is never enough ;)also i've got a few other filter modules i use with the Serge, - mainly
two multimode vcf's from
the roland system 700.
The matrix mixer is VERY handy for things like this, - routing audio
in and out of the serge.
With the dual vca module and the matrix mixer i recently had a patch
where i had the roland filter
routed back to itself giving extra resonance under voltage control.
Or i use it with a tape-echo or my eventide or lexicon.
I'll get the other serge vcf's sometime in the future but for now i can
do without..
On May 31, 2007, at 12:53 AM, matthew carpenter wrote:
> Well, I haven't had a use for a quantizer. I would rather use the
> space for something like a Boolean Logic or Schmitt Trigger. I'm
> interested in creating very stupid artificial intelligence or
> something like that. That, and having all of the Serge manglers and
> filters! That's what you're lacking. That's an interesting and very
> nice selection. How is the matrix mixer? I just noticed that you have
> the VCFQ(X) and EQ but no VCF2 or VCFS. Maybe your Filter is my
> Quantizer?
>
>
> On 5/30/07, Kim Hansen <kimgh@...> wrote:
>> sequencer panel later ?
>>
>>
>> I was also in the process of planning a custom panel
>> when Rex's mail dropped, - so i've just ordered it before the
>> deadline.
>> I'd been planning and giving it a lot of thought for some time now,
>> so i'm pretty confident that it's the layout i want - but i'd still
>> like all you fellow sergers comments and advice.
>>
>> what i've ordered:
>>
>> QUAN(tkb) - PCO - NCOM - PDIV - RS - SSG - CVPRO - DSG - ADSR
>>
>> what i've already got:
>>
>> panel #1:
>>
>> PNRV - NTO - PCO - RING - VCM - AMX - VCFQX - DTG - UAP
>>
>> panel #2:
>>
>> FRS - CM - EQ - MAX - PRC - SPRC - 2VCA
>>
>> panel #3
>>
>> SEQ8 - DUAL ASR - ACPR - DTG - BLOG - SQP4
>>
>> I mean to get a TKB later, hence the QUAN for tkb.
>>
>> What do you think should be different in the new panel ?
>> I like to use my serge equally for processing external sources, noise
>> sculpture and regular synth stuff.
>>
>>
>> Kim
>>
>> http://www.antenne.suite.dk
>>
>> On May 30, 2007, at 11:41 PM, matthew carpenter wrote:
>>
>> > Haha, no no. Sorry, I hijacked this thread and now you're confusing
>> me
>> > with the other guy. I hope he doesn't feel left out! There's just so
>> > little time to decide!
>> >
>> > I have the three panel system I posted pics of and was looking at a
>> > panel that's comprised of a few things from the Soup Kitchen. My
>> > future plans were two custom panels with a mix of sequencing and
>> > effects but that ain't gonna happen, now.
>> >
>> > Do you, or any other list members have experience with the ext.
>> > carrier version of the Frequency Shifter? (Yep, I've read the entire
>> > history of this list and search the archives for comments on
>> specific
>> > modules from time to time)
>> >
>> > And, yeah, I did learn a thing or two from the rise and fall of the
>> > Fist, John, don't worry!
>> >
>> > I thought I'd take the liberty of making this THE 'final custom
>> panel'
>> > thread -- sorry!
>> >
>> >My current config, for anyone who wishes to comment:
>> >
>> > NTO / PCO / VCM / AMX (w/ phase switch) / SSG w/ noise / DTG (w/ sig
>> > ins) / VCFQ(X) / UAP
>> >
>> > BUFF / SCPR / ACPR / ADSR / ADSR / VCF2 / MIX2 / VCFQ(X) / EQ
>> >
>> > NTO / TWS / RING / NCOM / ACPR / 2RVG / DTG / VCFS / 2PHA
>> >
>> > I will certainly add a sequencer and/or TKB in the future so this
>> last
>> > custom panel is meant to cover some territory I don't have covered,
>> > already:
>> >
>> > PRNV / CM / FRS(X) / QUO(?) / XFAD / WAD / BUFF / AMX / VCM / DCSM
>> >
>> > I already have a VCM so I'm not sure about that one. But you can't
>> get
>> > one anywhere else and I'd hate to buy a Soup Kitchen just for a VCM.
>> > Anyway, that's my idea. Looks like a Soup Kitchen but I already have
>> > a 2PHA and I'm thinking of going for the ext. carrier version of the
>> > Frequency Shifter, which it doesn't seem like either of the SK's
>> use.
>> > So, the VCM and QUO spots are up for grabs, pretty much, and IMO,
>> you
>> > can't have enough scaling buffers or mixers.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 5/30/07, darkstr1746@... <darkstr1746@... >
>> > wrote:So it looks like your going to have two FRS and two WADs???
>> > sonic damage abounds!! hahaha. With that set up, i personally don't
>> > see any benifit by adding the BUFF and STR. But that's just my
>> opinion
>> > based on how i used that configuration. Others who are more
>> > knowledgable with that module might shed some light. Not sure about
>> > the NCOM in conjunction with that panel but it might fit in with the
>> > othe panels better. One thing i learned from hard experience was
>> that
>> > when at all possible you should stick with "like functioning"
>> modules
>> > in one panel. I made several panels that when used with my system as
>> > it was then were quite functional and made sense but when looked at
>> as
>> > "stand alones" were a complete train wreck and exceedingly hard to
>> > sell later on. Just a word of wisdom.
>> >> So choose wisely Grasshoppa : )
>> >> kind regards
>> >>
>> >> jduval
>> >>
>> >>> -------------- Original message --------------
>> >>> From: "matthew carpenter" <matfhew.carpenfer@ gmail.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> Right, John, thank you.
>> >>>
>> >>> Here's the layout I'm considering for a complement to my other
>> three:
>> >>>
>> >>> PRNV / FRS(X) / CM / XFAD / QUO / WAD / BUFF / AMX / NCOM / STR /
>> >>> DCSM
>> >>>
>> >>> I may change the sequence. Only shop panels I can foresee picking
>> >>> up in the future would be the Sequencer panel and a TKB. So, the
>> >>> panel above is in keeping with those plans so I don't
>> unnecessarily
>> >>> duplicate something.
>> >>>
>> >>> Is it correct to assume that a QUO is a good addition to the FRS
>> >>> with external carrier since it doesn't have a QUO on board like
>> the
>> >>> non-ext. carrier version?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 5/30/07, darkstr1746@... < darkstr1746@... >
>> >>> wrote: All Freq Shift modules are 3" the extra space being taken
>> up
>> >>> by the CM. Rex will tell you that he doesn't do single modules.
>> That
>> >>> horse has been beat to death for years. The shop panels
>> >>> configuration is set.Anythingelse is custom and will probably
>> stay
>> >>> that way.
>> >>>> The only way for everyone to get a handle on this is to make the
>> >>>> phone call. Check out his head space and see what the deal is on
>> an
>> >>>> individual basis.
>> >>>> jduval
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> -------------- Original message --------------
>> >>>>> From: "matthew carpenter" < matfhew.carpenfer@...>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> How many inches does each version of the Frequency Shifter take?
>> >>>>> The table says 3 but the pictures of the panels show 2.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 5/30/07, matthew carpenter < matfhew.carpenfer@...>
>> >>>>> wrote: I use the Active Processor all the time for audio. I'll
>> let
>> >>>>> you know if it'll do a jump cut.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Yes, I'd like to place a last minute order, too. Such short
>> >>>>>> notice!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Right, that was my point about getting a panel with certain
>> >>>>>> modules that we won't see on the shop panels... Or will we? All
>> >>>>>> of this raises more questions such as: Will there be new shop
>> >>>>>> panels with different configurations? Is Rex going to do
>> >>>>>> individual modules? Answers to these questions may be more
>> >>>>>> forthcoming by phone but they would certainly help me make my
>> >>>>>> decision more easily.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 5/30/07, riluttante < riluttante@...> wrote: --- In
>> >>>>>> SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "matthew carpenter"
>> >>>>>> <matfhew.carpenfer @...>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> > Yeah, I like the Triple Waveshaper and Wave Multipliers,
>> too.
>> >>>>>>> The EQ is
>> >>>>>>> > brilliant, and the VCF2, I've yet to form a more solid
>> opinion
>> >>>>>>> on, and I
>> >>>>>>> > have two Active Processors which I use all the time. The
>> NCOM
>> >>>>>>> is great, too,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Can you get the Active Processors to make a real hard
>> jump-cut,
>> >>>>>>> with no audible "fade"
>> >>>>>>> between the signals, when used with audio?
>> >>>>>>> Or does nobody use the AP with audio?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> > so many uses, and Rex called it a rock crusher, once. I'll
>> be
>> >>>>>>> getting
>> >>>>>>> > another, and most of the lefthand side of a Soup Kitchen.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> So you're placing a last-minute custom order too?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> > But, should any of us consider a module that we wouldn 't be
>> >>>>>>> able to get on a
>> >>>>>>> > shop panel, or in a practical combination with o ther
>> modules?
>> >>>>>>> How about a
>> >>>>>>> > Matrix Mixer, for example? A Dual Schmitt Trigger? Does
>> anyone
>> >>>>>>> have either?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Yeah, I guess those are history, at least in the way we know
>> >>>>>>> them. I don't have a particular
>> >>>>>>> need for either of those modules, I think, but you're right in
>> >>>>>>> that if you'd want to own one,
>> >>>>>>> you'd need to put a panel together right now. There's no way
>> I'm
>> >>>>>>> ordering another
>> >>>>>>> complete Soup Kitchen, but I really want another Wave
>> Multiplier
>> >>>>>>> and EQ.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>