SergeModular

Eureka. You've solved it.

I think it's pretty much the densest and most complex 'module' on any
modular system I know of. Each half can be LFO, AD, ASD, low-pass
gate, slew limiter, audio oscillator, trigger delay, envelope
follower, sub-oscillator / pulse divider, and probably some other
things I've forgotten too.

Have fun...

--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "roelelec" <r.steverink@...> wrote:
>
> Something struck me about the arrows.
> I think I have it now. The arrow points in the direction which part
> it corresponds with. So the left side works with the signal in left
> pointed arrow and the right pointed arrow with the right part.
> Or is it more complicated?
>
> --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros
> <synth_freak_2000@> wrote:
> >
> > i forgot:
> > black audio ins:
> >
> > also, input a gate there, to create an ASR envelope instead of an
> AR envelope that the TG 'normally' is.
> >
> >
> > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> >
> > [Doepfer_a100] group owner
> >
> > www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> >
> > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
> >
> > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> >
> > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> >
> > www. DiN. org. uk
> >
> > www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
> >
> > www. shimarecords. co. uk
> >
> > www. rubberrecords. gr
> >
> > Athens - Greece
> >
> > --- On Fri, 2/20/09, roelelec <r.steverink@> wrote:
> > From: roelelec <r.steverink@>
> > Subject: [SergeModular] Re: Soft Sync + Linear FM
> > To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Friday, February 20, 2009, 10:39 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > That's something I haven't tried yet.
> >
> > Thanks for the tip.
> >
> > I will try this, cause I'm also very curious how much it
> >
> > differs/matches the soft sync effect of the other osc's.
> >
> >
> >
> > The Timegen osc is still a puzzle to me.
> >
> > I don't remember how I patched it (I'm gonna note these findings
> >
> > carefully down from now on) but a couple of times turning the rise
> >
> > knob revealed only a small area of frequenties, just if the right
> >
> > part was transformed in a notch filter or something?
> >
> >
> >
> > I also haven't the faintest idea what the signal in's (in the
> middle)
> >
> > can be used for?
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> >
> > Roel
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In SergeModular@ yahoogroups. com, "kkonkkrete"
> <kkonkkrete@ ...>
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > If I remember correctly, you can get some (roughly) hard-sync
> style
> >
> > > effects using your timegen osc, or more generally any of the
> slope /
> >
> > > transient generator variants. Use the trigger switch to make the
> >
> > > right half self trigger (oscillate). Now patch the gate out of
> the
> >
> > > left half into the trig in of the right half. I think you should
> >
> > now
> >
> > > have the right oscillator re-triggered by the left oscillator.
> Mess
> >
> > > with frequency offsets. Instant razorblade cocktail. Just don't
> >
> > cut
> >
> > > yourself.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > --- In SergeModular@ yahoogroups. com, "roelelec" <r.steverink@ >
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Hi John,
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Yeah I know what sync is, that it eliminates the beating when
> two
> >
> > > > osc's frequenties are locked in together. It's the way of
> getting
> >
> > > > razor sharp sounds in stead of the more organic, floating
> sounds
> >
> > like
> >
> > > > f.e. strings.
> >
> > > > But is soft syc then only the soft variant of hard sync? I'm no
> >
> > > > technician. I'm interested and very much like to know.
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Cause I reckon soft sync must have more uses that only
> >
> > eliminating
> >
> > > > the beating. Why otherwise did Serge include soft sync in his
> >
> > osc's
> >
> > > > and not the so favourable hard sync? Which are the secrets?
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Thanks for the info on the waveforms!
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Cheers,
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Roel
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > --- In SergeModular@ yahoogroups. com, John P <johnp299792@ >
> wrote:
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > > > soft sync is used when you want two or more oscillators to
> >
> > track
> >
> > > > > together, in sync, *without* beating.
> >
> > > > > If you patch two oscillators from, say, your SSG Stepped Out
> >
> > into
> >
> > > > their
> >
> > > > > 1V/Oct inputs, they will track together, but no matter how
> well
> >
> > you
> >
> > > > tune
> >
> > > > > them, there will be some beating, and the beating will change
> >
> > as
> >
> > > > the
> >
> > > > > pitch input changes. Patching the Sawtooth of one into the
> >
> > Sync of
> >
> > > > the
> >
> > > > > other one will eliminate this beating, if the Osc's are tuned
> >
> > > > closely to
> >
> > > > > begin with.
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > > > roelelec wrote:
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > My question is: what's the use of soft sync in general?
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
>