john-- no joke... the drift of the thread on sdiy was "why isn't anyone making innovate synth modules"... and my (apparently too subtle) point was there's lots of innovative work being done, by folks like brice & grant & ken... sorry if that wasn't clear. and seriously, the patch i described (minus the gonkulator, which i haven't finished yet) is much more typical in my rig than vco->vcf->vca... lbd on 5/7/04 6:15 PM, SynthModules@yahoogroups.com at SynthModules@yahoogroups.com wrote: > Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:34:01 -0400 > From: "john mahoney" <jmahoney@gate.net> > Subject: Fw: WHY? (was Re: [sdiy] ... Simulating a Moog) > > The following was on Synth-DIY: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "rdrake" >> >>> Is everyone here TRULY happy with the standard >>> VCO->VCF->VCA combination? >> >> OH MY GOD! i thought the standard combination was PSIM->Noise > Ring->VCF(steiner)->VCO->WaveFolder->Neural Agonizer->SuperWhizGonkulator... > WHY DIDN'T SOMEBODY TELL ME SOONER? all this time, wasted... sob... > > > I say, "Congratulations to the PSIM-1!" You know you've arrived when people > make jokes about you. :-) > -- > john > >
Message
Re: Fw: WHY? (was Re: [sdiy] ... Simulating a Moog)
2004-05-08 by R. Drake
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.