SynthModules

Oops! I forgot that you are "one of us." I thought your post was from one of
those "sick of hearing about the PSIM" people -- you know, those jealous
folks. ;-)

Cheers!
--
john


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "R. Drake" <rdrake@data2action.com>
To: <SynthModules@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 12:03 AM
Subject: [SynthModules] Re: Fw: WHY? (was Re: [sdiy] ... Simulating a Moog)


> john--
>
> no joke... the drift of the thread on sdiy was "why isn't anyone making
> innovate synth modules"... and my (apparently too subtle) point was
there's
> lots of innovative work being done, by folks like brice & grant & ken...
> sorry if that wasn't clear.  and seriously, the patch i described (minus
the
> gonkulator, which i haven't finished yet) is much more typical in my rig
> than vco->vcf->vca...
>
> lbd
>
>
>
> on 5/7/04 6:15 PM, SynthModules@yahoogroups.com at
> SynthModules@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:34:01 -0400
> > From: "john mahoney" <jmahoney@gate.net>
> > Subject: Fw: WHY? (was Re: [sdiy] ... Simulating a Moog)
> >
> > The following was on Synth-DIY:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "rdrake"
> >>
> >>> Is everyone here TRULY happy with the standard
> >>> VCO->VCF->VCA combination?
> >>
> >> OH MY GOD!  i thought the standard combination was PSIM->Noise
> > Ring->VCF(steiner)->VCO->WaveFolder->Neural
Agonizer->SuperWhizGonkulator...
> > WHY DIDN'T SOMEBODY TELL ME SOONER?  all this time, wasted... sob...
> >
> >
> > I say, "Congratulations to the PSIM-1!" You know you've arrived when
people
> > make jokes about you. :-)
> > --
> > john
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Be sure to check out the primary Web site at:
> http://www.SynthModules.com
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>