I remeber when I got the program, "Buzz" on my computer. It's buggy
as all hell but you know what? In 1977 I would have had to have
been a PHD student at a major university and I would have had to
schedule lab time in a multi-hunred thousand dollar lab to use a
system even remotely resembling that..... in some ways we have
embarrassments of riches these days...
I guess I might modify some of my original statements to agree that
this is like when PCs first were made available to the masses...
Maybe it isn't anything completely new (didn't even Debussy try to
make music based upon fibbonacci sequences? and I wrote a fibbonacci
counting program in basic, I'm trying to think how to make envelopes
somehow shaped on those curves....)... still, with something so
open ended as the PSIM, the synergy between our ideas on the PSIM,
our complex modular patches, our musical melodies and progressions
(you guys do make up those too, don't you? :-)... it feels like
there is an incredible amout of creative possibility there..
God, maybe I'm just in a good mood or something because of
springtime, I don't know, but I've always read about things like the
Buchla 300 where you could pretty much make any key do anything, or
things like that one guy's (maybe it was one of the EMS people)
system where he had 128 formant filters all computer accessable, or
a computer synthi..... or a fairlight...
If you gave each of us access to a full orchestra, all the time, and
we could make the musicians do whatever we wanted them too, maybe it
wouldn't be completely "original" but all of our creativities and
personalities would be expressed in unique and special ways.... and
if we spent enough time with our orchestras, tweaking everything
untill it was "right," I think we could generate some really
wonderful things. I guess that's what I'm saying....
Okay, Now I've got this huge smile on my face. I realize I sound
kind of kooky right now.... I must admit I've been having lovey
dovey conversations with my girlfriend all day and it's beautiful
outside and I'd just blow off everything and drink wine and garden
if I had the choice today (but I still don't think that invalidates
what I'm saying about the PSIM.. can't we be in a terrific mood and
be considered "rational" at the same time? ;-)...
Jonathan
--- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "john mahoney" <jmahoney@g...>
wrote:
> > Suddenly it occurred to me that the PSIM would be good for all
kinds
> > of scales.... couldn't we, for all intents and purposes, assign
any
> > arbitrary scale here? I mean, map any set of values against any
> > other set.... polyphonically?!?
>
> Heck, yeah!
>
> Versatile scaling and quantizing is why I once wrote that only a
PSIM could
> interface an ARP (1V/Oct), an MS-20 (linear VCOs), an EML
(1.2V/Oct) and a
> Synthi (0.5V/Octave?) together so they'd all play in tune with
each other.
>
>
> > excited about that possibility.... a quantizing Shift register
in
> > some exotic scale... the other PSIM with polyphonic quanting to
that
> > same scale.... with that whole idea of one input plays unisons
while
> > another plays scale-tone chords w/voltage controlled
inversions....
>
> Cool. I like that the "idea of one input plays unisons while
another plays
> scale-tone chords" has become a recurring theme. :-)
>
>
> > And to think I could have all that in a multi program and just
> > switch programs to some wild and crazy modulation source,
polyphonic
> > glide, or even a spare ADSR...... This module was a God-inspired
> > stroke of genius, whether anyone realizes that or not.
>
> The PSIM can do things that I always wanted (Cycling74's) Max to
do, but Max
> never had access to analog I/O (as far as I knew).
>
>
> > Does anyone else have the feeling that this could actually
DEFINE A
> > NEW KIND OF MUSIC, or drastically change the way we make music?
>
> As a devoted Psimian (the P is silent ;-) I hate to say no, but I
think the
> answer is "No." I say this mainly because there are hardly any new
ideas! I
> am pretty sure that concepts like "algorithmic harmony generators"
have all
> been tried.
>
> But the PSIM is exciting because the cool tools have been released
from the
> laboratories and placed into the hands of the teeming masses
(well, at least
> a small group of analog nuts). It's like when personal computers
were first
> introduced. Although it might not be conceptually new, having
access to this
> power is totally new for most of us.
>
>
> > In a way, it's like a modular within a modular... It makes me
feel
> > like I have a Buchla 300 system or something [:-)
>
> Like I said, nothing is *really* new.
>
>
> > These PSIMs are the most exciting thing in my entire modular
> > synth....
>
> Now, why would you say that? Because it's a voltage controlled
quantizer,
> scaler, logic module, sample & hold, LFO, Envelope Generator,
Andrew's Dream
> Sequencer, and more, all in one? ;-)
>
> --
> john <--(still deprived of synth-playing & PSIM-programming time
due to huge
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> project at work, but it's almost finished!)
>
>
> P.S. Why isn't Brice going to make any more PSIMs?