This same problem has been seen with other analog modular manufacturers, not just Cynthia's. It would have been interesting if Gino Robair had made a strong emphasis about this issue in both his EM review articles. My personal take on the issue is: a small enterprise like theirs should be expected to be slow. Understandably. What is not acceptable is consistently promising lead times that are not met. This very quickly leads to frustration and anger in customers. I paid for my ZO fully, with the expectation of a 6-wk lead time. It's now been 4-plus months, and nada. I think we should be given a realistic lead time from the start, as frequently this becomes part of the equation used to decide to go with brand X vs brand Y or even Z. Paul Schreiber's MOTM is, in my opinion, one of the best-quality modulars (if not the best) in the market today, and yet his promised lead times were so consistently not met that I finally decided to give up on his brand altogether. Now, looking back, I wish I had kept my MOTM, but at the time I sold it out of anger and frustration. On the other hand, Blacet, Modcan and DOtcom always meet their promised lead times with chronometric precision. And they're also excellent brands. Bottom line? Word to the wise: if you really want a modular system, be willing to accept some of the idiosyncracies of the manufacturers. Fairly warned, be thee, says I! Nobody else is making a zeroscillator, right? If you're tired of waiting for this, ask Cynthia for a refund, then order a 261e from Don Buchla.....then that will set off a whole new set of frustrated threads on the fora. Or better yet, get an Evolver. Or an Access Virus. Or... Me? I'll just wait. Cynthia, pleeeeeeze..... ;-)
Message
Re: Dotcom ZO's? or when does a delay get so long it just becomes a memory
2006-10-26 by cuari7
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.