Hi Mark - Well, that's just it, I don't get any variation when I patch it as you just described. I'm off to try again just to make sure, but I think there may be something not quite right...I'll let you know later this evening. Mike --- In The_Cyndustries_List@yahoogroups.com, "tuninghead" <thruzero@s...> wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Once again, thanks for the great review! > > Here's a little help. I was wondering why the sounds you posted were > not showing off the dynamic FM capabilities of the ZO. Your latest > post revealed the reason why: > > ==================================================== > * I can't get the INDEX CV to actually do anything unless I connect > the EG to the DYNAMIC 1 input, then connect the MOD OUT to the INDEX > CV input. In other words, unless there's feedback the EG's CV does > not seem to affect the timbre even with the pot turned fully clockwise. > ==================================================== > > It seems you have things patched backwards. Your envelope should be > patched into the INDEX CV input. The knob above it is an attenuator > for that signal which lets you adjust the modulation index or depth. > Patch your modulation signal (audio sine wave or whatever) into one of > the DYNAMIC inputs. I think a whole new world awaits. Now I'm > looking forward to some NEW sounds from you! > > I hope this helps you and anyone else that also might have been > confused by this. Maybe an update to the manual is in order. The > Zeroscillator is new to all of us and with its myriad capabilities, > we're all on the same voyage of discovery. > > Big thanks to Mike and all the early adopters, > --Mark Barton >
Message
Re: Biggy Impressions of the ZO
2006-01-25 by Mike Marsh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.