--- alsound2 <alsound2@...> wrote:
> Thanks Frank and David,
>
> Your suggestions are very useful for me.
> I think I'll go for a S1100 (what about s3000 xl? or
> s2800? just for
> ask;).
>
> P.S. David, thank you for your words for
> Venice...yeah, it's full of
> history and sometimes we (who was born here like me)
> forget it..It's
> everything so "normal" for us..
>
> Talk to you later
> Thanks :)
>
>
>
>
> > HI STEFANO.
> > FIRST I WANT TO SAY HOW MUCH I LOVE VENICE.ALL
> THAT
> > GREAT MUSICAL HISTORY. VIVALDI, MARCELLO,ALBINONI.
> > ANYWAY BEFORE I RUN AT THE MOUTH,TAKE THE ADVICE,
> BUY
> > AN 1100!!!IF YOU WANT TO RECORD WITH THIS IT IS
> VERY
> > CLEAN. THE 1000 BLOWS NOISE.MOST OF THE CIRCUITRY
> WAS
> > CHANGED FOR THE 1100. 90'S TECHNOLOGY !! GOOD LUCK
>
> >
> > DAVID CASTLE. N.Y.C.
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Discover Yahoo!
> > Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for
> the weekend.
> Check it out!
> > http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html
>
>
>
STEFANO.
THE 3000 SERIES WERE THE FIRST SAMPLERS AKAI MADE WITH
RESONANT FILTERS. THIS I FEEL GIVES THE S3000XL A
FATTER SOUND. THE ONE HUGE PLUS IS THAT THE 3000
SERIES IS 32 VOICE POLYPHONY. THE 1100 IS 16 VOICE
POLYPHONY.
THE 3000XL HAS A NICE FEATURE CALLED MULTI MODE. THIS
WOULD BE USEFUL FOR LIVE PLAYING. I THINK IF YOU ARE
PLAYING ON MORE THAN ONE MIDI CHANNEL YOU WOULD BE
BETTER OFF WITH THE S3000XL.THE 1100 HAS A WONDERFUL
CHARACTER FOR ORCHESTRAL SAMPLES. IT HAS A VERY
NATURAL
SOUND.NOT AS FAT AS THE 3000, BUT YOU DONT WANT THAT
WITH MOST AUTHENTIC ORCHESTRAL MUSIC.LISTEN TO THE
MIROSLAV VITOUS SAMPLES OR THE PETER SIEDLACZEKS THRU
THE 1100.PLAYED CORRECTLY YOU WILL FOOL ANYONE.LET ME
KNOW WHAT YOU BUY. TAKE CARE.
DAVID CASTLE
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com