On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Colin f wrote: > The processor in P3 has a 16 bit address space, so the 64k that's fitted > is the maximum possible without bank switching. ahhhh... > Bear in mind that each track's patterns are independent - there are 384 > 16 step patterns in there with 8 bytes of data per step. it's hard for me to think in those terms... trying to pull other patterns is somethign i might do occasionally but not frequently. > To support more memory, I'd need to design bank-switching logic with > extra memory slots on a daughtboard, and add software support for it. > Not impossible, but there would need to be some demand for it. would it be something you'd hate doing and wouldn't use yourself? if so, i wouldn't want you to bother with it. but if it does interest you, i'm sure there'd be a decent demand... about how much do you think the extra PCB would cost? would a new mainboard be necessary (yikes!) bleep. out. --- http://leichenfeld.iuma.com http://thirdwavecollective.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] sending program changes
2004-06-03 by blip
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.