> i've got something new i'd like to see if possible; in pattern-edit, > i'd like to be able to shift the aux-tracks independantly from the > main track, i.e. without shifting the actual notes themselves. and > continuing from that, AUX-events to shift the aux(d) track > independantly from the main track. That's easy to do at a software level, but trickier to find the UI for. FUNC+rotate already has a purpose, and the last space for a softkey in pattern edit mode is going to become 'note rng', for setting the base note and range for pitch entry. Need to think about it... > and of course i've got a question about this; why are the AUX-events > and accumulator for the AUX-events only focused on D, and not on A, B > or C as well? i'm guessing it's something practical like there not > being enough room in the OS... not that i've actually come across a > need for more accumulators on a track, but having 4 LFO-ish > accumulators per track would be mad....in a good sense of course. :-) The processing of accumulator functions is quite code and processor intensive, so I chose to limit the aux accumulator to aux D only to avoid making the clock pulse handling code too big and sloppy. An aux accumulator on aux A would be somewhat pointless anyway, as the auxes are processed in order with A first, so there is no aux in front of A to do the offsetting before A is processed. That's also the reason why there is no mask or randomize events that apply to aux A. If you despearately want more aux accumulation on a single track, remember you can always use another track's aux D with accumulation, and grab values from it. Or wait for P4, which will have much, much greater processing power than P3. If I ever get time to do P4... I've only got as far as buying the dev board for the candidate CPU. Cheers, Colin f
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] wishlist cont'd..
2004-06-23 by Colin f
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.