> i've got something new i'd like to see if possible; in pattern-edit,
> i'd like to be able to shift the aux-tracks independantly from the
> main track, i.e. without shifting the actual notes themselves. and
> continuing from that, AUX-events to shift the aux(d) track
> independantly from the main track.
That's easy to do at a software level, but trickier to find the UI for.
FUNC+rotate already has a purpose, and the last space for a softkey in
pattern edit mode is going to become 'note rng', for setting the base
note and range for pitch entry.
Need to think about it...
> and of course i've got a question about this; why are the AUX-events
> and accumulator for the AUX-events only focused on D, and not on A, B
> or C as well? i'm guessing it's something practical like there not
> being enough room in the OS... not that i've actually come across a
> need for more accumulators on a track, but having 4 LFO-ish
> accumulators per track would be mad....in a good sense of course. :-)
The processing of accumulator functions is quite code and processor
intensive, so I chose to limit the aux accumulator to aux D only to
avoid making the clock pulse handling code too big and sloppy.
An aux accumulator on aux A would be somewhat pointless anyway, as the
auxes are processed in order with A first, so there is no aux in front
of A to do the offsetting before A is processed. That's also the reason
why there is no mask or randomize events that apply to aux A.
If you despearately want more aux accumulation on a single track,
remember you can always use another track's aux D with accumulation, and
grab values from it.
Or wait for P4, which will have much, much greater processing power than
P3. If I ever get time to do P4... I've only got as far as buying the
dev board for the candidate CPU.
Cheers,
Colin f