Colin, > LED rings aren't part of the pot or encoder as far as I'm aware. It depends, you can buy the assembly 'complete'. Though it is VERY expensive, compared to an encoder + LEDs. > If only they'd used PLED displays. Those LCDs are so ugly ;-) If only they did PLEDs in decent sizes!! > I'm not so sure about LED rings only though - they are kind of limited in > the resolution they can display. Its to give you a 'feel' for the value, more as a point of refernce than anything else. > I was thinking of maybe 3 digits of 5x7 LED matrix next to each > encoder/endless pot, that could show numeric and note values. > Pricey though... Very. > The alternative would be a PLED display for each group of 4 pots/encoders. Looked into this, again, expensive, you're look at 4 of them. The big problem of course is that you probably can't put the displays close enough together. For some reason the only PLEDs I've found have very wide PCBs compared to some of the standard LCDs. > Or maybe just finding a cheap way to motorise Alpha pots. Hehe, lego? Paul
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] bigging up the p3 again.
2004-11-15 by Paul Maddox (Mail LIsts)
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.