On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 14:52:26 -0000, "arp1618" <tm29@st-and.ac.uk>
wrote:
> I think the playlist idea is a good one, and to be honest if it was
>done in the way you describe then i'd probably use the playlists alot
>more.
Same for me.
>If it means taking up valuable code space however i'm not up for it. I
Ditto, I agree totally.
>think more auxillary functions should be priority for any left over
>codespace. One in particular i'd like to see is another accumulator,
>perhaps aimed at aux C. I find alot of the setups i do require me to
>use two or even three tracks but this could be widdled down to one
>with this extra function. Modulate the modulator!
Hehe, I always want more Aux events! For example, I wanted an aux
event that did comparisons against another aux event. Or performed an
action based on the difference or sum of its own value and another aux
on a different row.
I sit and idly think of this stuff all day cos that's the kind of guy
I am. I should get out more...
Paul
---
Paul Nagle - SoftRoom Music - www.softroom.co.uk
Bogus Focus Records - www.BogusFocus.comMessage
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Playlist Revamp
2004-12-01 by Paul Nagle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.