Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Thread

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Production P3 Pricing

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Production P3 Pricing

2004-12-01 by Colin f

> Hey! I'm a "PC-loving Cubase fiend" and I'm just waiting to
> purchase a kit
> for one of these...

You 'get it', so you're excused ;-)

Cheers,
Colin f



________________________________________________
Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Production P3 Pricing

2004-12-01 by scd

on 01-12-2004 08:48, Colin f at colin@colinfraser.com wrote:

> 
>> Hey! I'm a "PC-loving Cubase fiend" and I'm just waiting to
>> purchase a kit
>> for one of these...
> 
> You 'get it', so you're excused ;-)

LOL!!
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> Cheers,
> Colin f
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________
> Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by scd

on 01-12-2004 12:48, Paul Nagle at softroom@btinternet.com wrote:

> 
> 
> So, I take it nobody minds at all if Colin revamps playlist edit as
> per my suggestion yesterday?

I certainly don't. I think it is a good idea!

Boele
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 8-)
> 
> I mean, it's not for me personally as I don't use playlists
> extensively - but with my reviewer's hat on, I *am* conscious of the
> learning curve and the way many reviewers might prefer the 'friendlier
> alternative'. 
> 
> Of course if it takes up more codespace, forget it dude! I know how
> tight things are....
> 
> Paul
> 
> ---
> Paul Nagle - SoftRoom Music - www.softroom.co.uk
> Bogus Focus Records - www.BogusFocus.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by Paul Nagle

So, I take it nobody minds at all if Colin revamps playlist edit as
per my suggestion yesterday?

8-)

I mean, it's not for me personally as I don't use playlists
extensively - but with my reviewer's hat on, I *am* conscious of the
learning curve and the way many reviewers might prefer the 'friendlier
alternative'. 

Of course if it takes up more codespace, forget it dude! I know how
tight things are....

Paul

---
Paul Nagle - SoftRoom Music - www.softroom.co.uk
          Bogus Focus Records - www.BogusFocus.com

Re: Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by arp1618

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, bleep <bleep@w...> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Paul Nagle wrote:
> 
> > So, I take it nobody minds at all if Colin revamps playlist edit as
> > per my suggestion yesterday?
> 
> I think the playlist idea is a good one, and to be honest if it was
done in the way you describe then i'd probably use the playlists alot
more.

If it means taking up valuable code space however i'm not up for it. I
think more auxillary functions should be priority for any left over
codespace. One in particular i'd like to see is another accumulator,
perhaps aimed at aux C. I find alot of the setups i do require me to
use two or even three tracks but this could be widdled down to one
with this extra function. Modulate the modulator!

What do you think Colin? Any room for one wee more accumulator,
obviously this would require another page in the accumulator config
aswell so i don't know if thats eating too much space or not.

Aye!

Tommy

Re: Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by arp1618

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle <softroom@b...> 
> 
> I sit and idly think of this stuff all day cos that's the kind of guy
> I am. I should get out more... 
> 
> 
No no Paul. Why should you get out more, what's it got to offer that
your P3 and synths don't. No! i say stay in and think up ideas for
auxilliary functions. It's bloody cold outside anyway!

Tommy

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by bleep

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Paul Nagle wrote:

> So, I take it nobody minds at all if Colin revamps playlist edit as
> per my suggestion yesterday?

it sounds like a good idea to me.

bleep.
out.

---
http://leichenfeld.iuma.com
http://thirdwavecollective.com

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Playlist Revamp

2004-12-01 by Paul Nagle

On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 14:52:26 -0000, "arp1618" <tm29@st-and.ac.uk>
wrote:

> I think the playlist idea is a good one, and to be honest if it was
>done in the way you describe then i'd probably use the playlists alot
>more.

Same for me.

>If it means taking up valuable code space however i'm not up for it. I

Ditto, I agree totally. 

>think more auxillary functions should be priority for any left over
>codespace. One in particular i'd like to see is another accumulator,
>perhaps aimed at aux C. I find alot of the setups i do require me to
>use two or even three tracks but this could be widdled down to one
>with this extra function. Modulate the modulator!

Hehe, I always want more Aux events! For example, I wanted an aux
event that did comparisons against another aux event. Or performed an
action based on the difference or sum of its own value and another aux
on a different row. 

I sit and idly think of this stuff all day cos that's the kind of guy
I am. I should get out more... 

Paul
---
Paul Nagle - SoftRoom Music - www.softroom.co.uk
          Bogus Focus Records - www.BogusFocus.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.