Analogue-sequencer

so, if there were a skip and unskip step n event, it would never be able to unskip because the event isn't unskipped until you actually arrive at the event (which wouldn't happen)? Damn, I was thinking that this would be a cool feature.


> 
> > I was wondering also whether there was a way to use the 
> > random mask to effect the skip step feature. Didn't see a way...
> 
> This isn't possible to implement.
> If a step is skipped, it never becomes the current step, so events can never
> act upon it to make it un-skipped.
> I could potentially add an event to advance another track forward by a step,
> but that could be time consuming (in terms of latency caused and
> implementation time). The code to advance a pattern to it's next step is
> more complicated than you might imagine (bear in mind it could be set to a
> random direction, and have any number of steps skipped).
> 
> Cheers,
> Colin f
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>