RE: [analogue-sequencer] oops - forgot another question last night
2004-12-23 by implode7@comcast.net
so, if there were a skip and unskip step n event, it would never be able to unskip because the event isn't unskipped until you actually arrive at the event (which wouldn't happen)? Damn, I was thinking that this would be a cool feature.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > > I was wondering also whether there was a way to use the > > random mask to effect the skip step feature. Didn't see a way... > > This isn't possible to implement. > If a step is skipped, it never becomes the current step, so events can never > act upon it to make it un-skipped. > I could potentially add an event to advance another track forward by a step, > but that could be time consuming (in terms of latency caused and > implementation time). The code to advance a pattern to it's next step is > more complicated than you might imagine (bear in mind it could be set to a > random direction, and have any number of steps skipped). > > Cheers, > Colin f > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >