On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:24:25 +0100, "Julian" <julian@22host24.com>
wrote:
>id be most interested to hear from anyone who has used both the sq16s and the p3...
I have.
>im realy looking for something that has cc's (will the p3 ever have more then 4 cc's ?) and that will be a but nicer to shape melodies of more than 16 steps on (yes, you can do this with the mams, but im sure there must be nicer ways) melodies looping on 16 bars would be good, with a nice interface to program them.
The P3 can send 32 CCs (8 tracks x 4 ccs per track). And you can do
stuff more than 16 steps - checkout playlists and also realtime record
options...
>i looked at the doepfer regelwerk, but with an inability to set individual gate lengths, i can hardly see how it can call itself a sequencer, and the rm1x is
So my ARP sequencer is not a sequencer? Wow....
I think it is important to look at what step sequencers offer and
compare step sequencers across the board. The P3 currently stands
above any existing sequencer for my own needs.... but our needs may
vary.
Paul
---
Paul Nagle - SoftRoom Music - www.softroom.co.uk
Bogus Focus Records - www.BogusFocus.com
Space Centre gig in Sept - checkout www.SpankTheDarkMonkey.co.uk for detailsMessage
Re: [analogue-sequencer] p3: would it be good for me?
2003-09-10 by Paul Nagle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.