> ah. ah-hah. so.... stuff that takes more than one button push would go > on my list... like dropping in & out of record, & selecting the track > to record into... is that what you meant by "cc's for edit"? Yes - there could be a CC for 'edit track' that would take a value of the track to be edited. Then a midi switch box could have 8 dedicated 'edit track n' and 8 dedicated 'record track n' buttons if you wanted. Would this be an improvement on sticky keys though ? If you haven't come across sticky keys, they are modifier keys with a timeout or toggle action, so pressing REC would display 'Select REC track', and then you'd press a track key on it's own to activate record. Similar thing for PLAY/EDIT and possibly FUNC. This replaces two-key combinations with 2 key sequences - easier if you only have one hand free. > what about.... mapping some program changes onto a bunch of > user-defined macros? given that nothing's more than a few button > pushes away anyway, you wouldn't have to store very much. Yikes. My scope creep alarm just went off ;-) Cheers, Colin f
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Remote control ?
2005-05-27 by Colin f
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.