Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Message

RE: [analogue-sequencer] competition

2005-06-16 by jez creek

> just as a matter of interest, why did you guys choose the p3 over the
Doepfer Maq 16/3?
> Are  they  different in their functionality?

Richard,
As someone who uses both I feel fairly qualified to answer this with a
resounding 'yes'. When I got the P3 I thought I'd be able to sell the MAQ,
but it is still useful to have a discrete knob for each note on each track
for tweaking in performance. By way of contrast, the P3 is more of a set-up
your notes in advance and edit patterns kind of unit. I find they complement
each other, but may end up just using the P3 to reduce the amount of gear
needed for a gig, especially if when the promised 'sticky' keys arrive.
Jez
http://www.modulator-esp.co.uk/





--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.7/20 - Release Date: 16/06/05


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.