Version 1.05 of P3Tools
2005-06-15 by em_dkj
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC
Thread
2005-06-15 by em_dkj
Hi Second time lucky I hope. ALL the aux events are selectable now. Oh ... and something I think I forgot to mention ... The quickest way of getting to the pattern config editor is to double click one of the pattern blocks in the main screen. Dave
2005-06-16 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:20:41 -0000, "em_dkj" <david@davekj.f2s.com> wrote: >Oh ... and something I think I forgot to mention ... The quickest way >of getting to the pattern config editor is to double click one of the >pattern blocks in the main screen. Wow - this is actually very impressive. You'll convert me to them computer things yet - brilliant work David! Paul --- Paul Nagle / Soft Room Music www.softroom.co.uk www.BogusFocus.com ** Binar's Project Poltergeist and Headshock's MFPE available direct from the Bogus site NOW. **
2005-06-16 by Colin f
> Wow - this is actually very impressive. > > You'll convert me to them computer things yet - brilliant work David! The display of what's 'in' a pattern is very handy. I think I might have to pinch that for P3 itself - possibly an 'info' softkey in playlist edit, that will tell you what's in each of the patterns... Cheers, Colin f
2005-06-16 by blixton
Do I need a computer to use the p3?
2005-06-16 by Colin f
> Do I need a computer to use the p3? No. You only need a computer if you want to run P3Tools, which is a sysex librarian and firmware updater, or similar. Cheers, Colin f
2005-06-16 by em_dkj
Hi Richard > just as a matter of interest, why did you guys choose the p3 over the Doepfer Maq 16/3? Are they different in their functionality? > I only have a P3, so I can't compare the two in the same manner as Jez. But when I decided to buy an Analogue style sequencer I was comparing the 16/3 and the P3 by reading manuals and comparing specs. I went for the P3 for the following reasons ... 1) 8 Tracks on P3, 3 on the 16/3. 2) Force To Scale. I can't produce a bum note however much I twiddle those knobs (and in my case that's a god send ;-) ). Doesn't exist on the 16/3 (or anything alse near this price range). 3) Aux Events and Accumulators. Sounded interesting and powerful. The reality is they are the trickiest thing on the P3 to get your head around. But stick at it and its really worth it. Powerful ... god yes. There is nothing like this on any other sequencer I know of. 4) Great support from the developer and other users. If you trawl through this group you can see that Colin is more than happy to answer questions from users and help them out with problems. Even better, he is open to feature requests and implements the best of them. You also have users like Mr Nagle, (a man who has used more than his fair share of sequencers in his time), also providing their help and expertise (Just look at Paul's user guide). I've had a P3 for 6 months now, and have no regrets. Its such damn good fun to use. No ... actually I have one regret. And that is that I should have got one MUCH MUCH sooner. Hope that helps Dave
2005-06-16 by Richard Scott
just as a matter of interest, why did you guys choose the p3 over the Doepfer Maq 16/3? Are they different in their functionality? Richard [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2005-06-16 by jez creek
> just as a matter of interest, why did you guys choose the p3 over the Doepfer Maq 16/3? > Are they different in their functionality? Richard, As someone who uses both I feel fairly qualified to answer this with a resounding 'yes'. When I got the P3 I thought I'd be able to sell the MAQ, but it is still useful to have a discrete knob for each note on each track for tweaking in performance. By way of contrast, the P3 is more of a set-up your notes in advance and edit patterns kind of unit. I find they complement each other, but may end up just using the P3 to reduce the amount of gear needed for a gig, especially if when the promised 'sticky' keys arrive. Jez http://www.modulator-esp.co.uk/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.7/20 - Release Date: 16/06/05 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2005-06-16 by jez creek
I should add that is highly unlikely I would have bought both if I had got the P3 first :-) Auxes and accumulators are great once you get your head round them and allow an almost modular approach to sequences FTS is cool, I can only use my MAQ with my Nord Modular as it has Note Quantise modules I'll second the point about support, I don't think it gets any better Cheers Jez
-----Original Message-----
From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of em_dkj
Sent: 16 June 2005 22:48
To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Re: competition
Hi Richard
> just as a matter of interest, why did you guys choose the p3 over
the Doepfer Maq 16/3? Are they different in their functionality?
>
I only have a P3, so I can't compare the two in the same manner as
Jez. But when I decided to buy an Analogue style sequencer I was
comparing the 16/3 and the P3 by reading manuals and comparing specs.
I went for the P3 for the following reasons ...
1) 8 Tracks on P3, 3 on the 16/3.
2) Force To Scale.
I can't produce a bum note however much I twiddle those knobs (and in
my case that's a god send ;-) ). Doesn't exist on the 16/3 (or
anything alse near this price range).
3) Aux Events and Accumulators.
Sounded interesting and powerful. The reality is they are the
trickiest thing on the P3 to get your head around. But stick at it
and its really worth it. Powerful ... god yes. There is nothing like
this on any other sequencer I know of.
4) Great support from the developer and other users.
If you trawl through this group you can see that Colin is more than
happy to answer questions from users and help them out with problems.
Even better, he is open to feature requests and implements the best
of them. You also have users like Mr Nagle, (a man who has used more
than his fair share of sequencers in his time), also providing their
help and expertise (Just look at Paul's user guide).
I've had a P3 for 6 months now, and have no regrets. Its such damn
good fun to use.
No ... actually I have one regret. And that is that I should have got
one MUCH MUCH sooner.
Hope that helps
Dave
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analogue-sequencer/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
analogue-sequencer-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.7/20 - Release Date: 16/06/05
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]2005-06-18 by philsmillie
Nice one Dave, P3 tools just keeps on getting better and better... Just like the P3! ;-) Phil