Analogue-sequencer

ferrograph632 wrote:

>you'll know what I mean if you've ever "transposed" a maq- it just
>adds or subtracts the same number of semitones from each note, which
>isn't very musical. at least the p3 forces the new notes to adhere to
>the same scale, but sometimes that's not quite right for a piece either.
>  
>
I love the idea of a "transpose channel" incorporated with Gary's 
suggestion where you get keyboard zones mappable to select scale, scale 
root, part transposition, scale select. Also, I'd love the P3 to 
transmit its scales so that a second, slaved P3, perhaps played by a 
second musician, could follow perfectly any key change made by the master.

Ah, Colin, isn't this P3 enthusiasm totally infectious? Doesn't it just 
make you want to start coding right away?

:)

Paul

---
Paul Nagle / Soft Room Music / Bogus Focus Records / Binar / Headshock / The Joint Intelligence Committee
        www.softroom.co.uk / www.BogusFocus.com / www.JointIntelligenceCommittee.com