> I am curious if there is a reason that the p3 has 8 tracks > instead of 16. I > realize that there must be a limit but it > seems since their are 16 keys it would be just as easy to have had 16 > tracks. The upper 8 step keys are used for part selection, so the UI would need significant changes to support more tracks. I picked 8 as a reasonable maximum number of tracks to put together the sort of music I do. It's a compromise of usability, pattern capacity, processing power, etc. Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] why 8 tracks?
2005-10-20 by Colin f