> Ok, I think I get it now. I was missing the crucial > distinction between > *pattern* and part. Until now, I used them interchangeably. An initialised bank has each part holding a single step playlist for each track, with the same pattern number as the part number. That's just to make life easier if you only want to use them that way, you can avoid any playlist editing. But this can make it seem like the parts are just groups of patterns. Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Pattern copy, remain "linked"?
2006-01-29 by Colin f