Analogue-sequencer

Colin,
I take your point about the 3 character display which is why I
suggested 'C -' (rather than 'C -1'). Obviously without 4 characters
the range choice would be between 'C -' to 'G 9' (middle C4) or the
current 'C 0' to 'G X'(middle C5). 

A large part of this request is perhaps due to the way I work as all
Roland  gear uses C4 as middle C and I use a MC-80 & MC-50 to directly
record sequences I play in addition to the P3, very often I will
'read' part  (or all) of a sequence from MC-80 display then enter the
notes into the P3 for more aux work then re-record into the MC's etc.
So you can see I can very easily get confused across octaves.

Thanks
Roger


--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "Colin f" <colin@...> wrote:
> The issue with P3 is that the display only really has space for 3
> characters.
> The octave 10 notes being called things like C#X is rather clunky,
so C#-
> for C#-1 wouldn't be any worse.
> Assuming that it meant P3 note names corresponded with the majority
of other
> devices and software that used them, I could be persuaded to change it.
> But if, as it seems, there's a roughly even split between the uses
of C3, C4
> and C5 as MIDI middle C, it doesn't seem worthwhile, since the whole
issue
> is so cloudy.

> 
> Best regards,
> Colin Fraser
> Sequentix Music Systems Ltd
> http://www.sequentix.com
>