> Here's another scenario: I set up a playlist which plays a > pattern at > tonic, and then transposes to dominant. I still want FTS on > the tonic > (perhaps I'm recording into the pattern in arpeggio mode), > but I want > the dominant shift to be chromatic. > > I think we're getting into a more general realm of where FTS should > be applied in the chain of calculations which determine what note > comes out on each step, so I doubt there's a sensible solution > without a complete redesign. There is already the option to make PXPos pre or post FTS. The playlist transpose values for each step have a couple of unused bits, since the range is limited to 64 values. Possibly one of those bits could be used to support pre/post FTS playlist transpose too. But not until I've had a rest from P3 coding for a while... Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] FTS Defeat
2006-04-12 by Colin f
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.