Analogue-sequencer

Paul Nagle <softroom@...> wrote:
>
> I can understand the need for smoothness when doing cutoff frequency or 
> volume tweaks. But trying to do it with note sequences, unless you're 
> trying to get as close to replicating a scale as possible, just strikes 
> me as am unusual goal. I guess I just have much wilder hopes for that 
> remaining space...:)
> 
> Paul
> 

Maybe someone has suggested this already I might have missed it.  (I
am just offering my opinion).

In a perfect world, when jumping to another pattern where the knobs
are in really different positions that the previous pattern, I would
prefer that turning the knob would become active when it crosses the
stored pattern's value, thus removing the inadvertant jump due to the
circumstances.... (A sort of manual nulling of the pot).

I prefer this to "relative" motion incrementing, which doesn't quite
work without endless rotary encoders, or the existing "that's the way
it is" jump simply due to the initial position of the pots....

Gary