Analogue-sequencer

semi off topic, but I found when I slave my midi gear (P3, MDrum, MPC) etc.... to my protools le setup I get much more responsive start and stop commands, then vice versa....

I used to always record using my DAW as the slave, sending start/stop commands from midi gear but it would result in less than stelar start timing.

Is this a well documented thing,ie: something that happens to everyone, Or am i just CRAZY!!

bit 2 much smoke over the years which possibly has driven me mad....
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Nagle 
  To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 12:04 PM
  Subject: Re: [analogue-sequencer] OT: Windows Midi Timing


  Zed Velkovich wrote:
  > You wrote that we should not sync to a primitive midi clock, what did you have in mind?
  >   
  No, I wrote that Cubase SX cannot be slave to MIDI clock (or couldn't 
  last time I looked). It's one reason I remained with Cubase VST (before 
  later abandoning both of them).

  Of course, you can send MIDI clock *from* SX for the P3 to be slave to.

  Paul

  ---
  Paul Nagle / Soft Room Music / Bogus Focus Records / Binar / Headshock / The Joint Intelligence Committee
          www.softroom.co.uk / www.BogusFocus.com / www.JointIntelligenceCommittee.com 
  ** New JIC Live CD available at the BogusFocus site now!! ** 

                        



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    a..  Visit your group "analogue-sequencer" on the web.
      
    b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     analogue-sequencer-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]