Analogue-sequencer

Olivier,

I'd say decide for the P3, here's a quick list:

- the P3 architecture needs a little if you want to do complex  
things, but get into using P3 tracks/patterns/banks is done in 5minutes
- one can use the P3 easily for simultanious 8 tracks of x0x  
programming (even more incombination with the patterns)
- colin improves the P3 OS constantly while the Schaltwerk is a dead  
product
- its quite easy to use P3 along PC/mac sequencers
- doepfer stuff isn't that easy to control (I had a MAQ for long  
time) so you might have a hard time with the schaltwerk and are stuck  
while the P3 still grows in features
- I need to recapture some P3 features from time to time when rarely  
used

having a SND analog step sequencer and a P3 I'd have all  
possibilities of midi and CV controling here (I sold a FutureRetro  
Mobius and MAQ as they couldn't stand next to P3)

hope some of my points help for a descision.

cheers,
henry

Am 29.05.2006 um 12:18 schrieb Olivier Tison:

> about point 3/ I have a bonus question, maybe you P3 users can  
> answer, do
> you get over the P3 "obscure" architecture quickly, I mean if you come
> either from a xOx background or from a "cubase/linear programming"
> background  ? how anal/intuitive is the programming on the P3 ? do  
> you refer
> to the manual often when programming ?
>
> cheers,
>
>
> Olivier

best regards,
henry stamerjohann






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]