Analogue-sequencer

>>One thing that won't feature on the next sequencer will be the name
"P4". Google on P3 and you get 60 million irrelevant pages. For P4
that rises to nearer 90 million.
Whereas if you Google on Sequentix, the vast majority of hits refer to
the P3 Sequencer.<<

I disagree. if someone's really looking for "our" p3, they're probably
bright enough to feed google a few more clues via the "advanced
search" page instead of just typing "p3" & trawling the million hits....
typing "p3", "sequencer" & "midi" into the "all of these words" box
yielded almost 60,000 hits, but the right ones were at the top, &
that's without mention of either "analogue" or "sequentix", which
would be harder words to get right in other languages.
now, if someone's too dumb to use google like this, they aren't going
to get the best out of something like the p3, are they?
anyway, someone's made sure it's in wikipedia, so that's that.
[ends rant]

duncan.