Analogue-sequencer

I think sequentix is a great name, like you pointed out, just build on that!

Last model was the Sequentix P3, next one can be Sequentix ?whatever?
Each model just has its own name, under the Sequentix brand....

seems easy enough...

Sequentix Unity
Sequentix Isis
Sequentix P303
Sequentix GT
Sequentix RS
Sequentix Sequencer - ha!

good luck with the naming colin, that the least of your worries! haha


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Steve 
  To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:44 AM
  Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Sequentix News


  Duncan,

  That's correct, if they are really looking for it. But if someone has
  just heard of "something called the p3" and wants to find it, that's
  what they'll search on.

  This isn't about smart person vs. dumb person, it's simply about the
  desire to have a unique name. This is very important for establishing
  brand recognition and a simple sense that a product is unique and
  different. If the next Sequentix (which is a great name, by the way)
  sequencer were called the P4 not only would the name get lost in the
  mass of other P4s out there (Pentium 4, etc), it would just sound like
  the P3 plus some.

  I think Colin is right on track with the idea of a new name. The
  problem is finding one. :) (I could think of a few, but they aren't
  good. The product name should be equally as good as the company name,
  I think.)

  -Steve

  --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "ferrograph632" 
  > I disagree. if someone's really looking for "our" p3, they're probably
  > bright enough to feed google a few more clues via the "advanced
  > search" page instead of just typing "p3" & trawling the million hits....
  > typing "p3", "sequencer" & "midi" into the "all of these words" box
  > yielded almost 60,000 hits, but the right ones were at the top, &
  > that's without mention of either "analogue" or "sequentix", which
  > would be harder words to get right in other languages.
  > now, if someone's too dumb to use google like this, they aren't going
  > to get the best out of something like the p3, are they?
  > anyway, someone's made sure it's in wikipedia, so that's that.
  > [ends rant]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]