On 16 Sep 2006, at 12:43, Richard wrote: > well 16 x 3 would be nice, but only 3 x 16, 6 x 8, or 12 x > 4 are availlable under the current OS What I meant was: why would you want 16 x 2 if there's (presumably) room for 16 x 3? nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http:// www.cassiel.com
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] program change
2006-09-16 by Nick Rothwell