> "Wouldn't that be 16 x 3?" > well 16 x 3 would be nice, but only 3 x 16, 6 x 8, or 12 x > 4 are availlable under the current OS The way patterns are divided up is based on taking bits from the pattern number and giving them to the bank number. So it only works easily with binary increments - 4, 8, 16... 2 patterns per bank would be possible in theory, but there isn't enough memory left to hold the extra data for bank settings, parts and playlists. Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] program change
2006-09-16 by Colin Fraser