Octopus seems pretty fun :) There's a guy in town who's got one, I'll have to try and go play! /// on another note \\\ So I played my 2nd gig with the P3 this week (also my 2nd gig free of a computer!) at the SPARK festival of experimental music in MPLS. It was super fun!!! My set was really dorky/fun/random I don't really know how to explain it but if anybody is interested... *shameless self promoshun* have a listen: http://www.samroark.com/clientservices/heckaspark.mp3 \\\ get relaxed ;-) /// -josh --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle <softroom@...> wrote: > > Julian wrote: > > > I like leds... > > Me too - very much so. But I also like to think of new features that > give me greater power - and flexibility to go beyond what is currently > possible; those "what if" moments that Colin loves so much <g>. Very > often, because I am not a genius, I only start to imagine new features > by extrapolating or warping something that exists already. If we waited > until every idea had bloomed to its maximum potential, products would be > forever in development and never see the light of day. > > If you choose to give an instrument a fixed UI, this means any new > features must be made to fit within the existing UI and this, > eventually, limits expansion for consistency reasons (or things start to > get complicated - something the fixed UI is designed to avoid). > > There is a great argument for not throwing in every feature and that > limitations serve to make you work towards finding your own voice with > an instrument. I completely understand that point of view. Personally I > endorse it more for synths, perhaps because there is a reasonable > history behind them now and I personally know what I need/want to hand > for performance and what I can live with in menus. > > But for something a bit new and radical, I like instruments that grow > with use, that extend themselves into new areas and eventually evolve > into something that could never have sprung into life fully-formed. Thus > the P3 became a much more powerful instrument over time and now does > things we'd never have thought of on day 1. Imagine what a new sequencer > might take from this whole process and how starting afresh could be > really, really exciting... :) > > Apologies; a long ramble of opinion from my addled brain, > > -- > Paul > --- > "Effectus super absolutionem" > http://www.JointIntelligenceCommittee.com > http://www.myspace.com/jointintelligencecommittee > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/694 - Release Date: 20/02/2007 >
Message
Re: Paul's Octopus review in SOS
2007-02-24 by josh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.