Now I understand. ...never really use Xpose defeat either! ;-) do many of yous out there? On 10/12/07, Colin Fraser <colin@sequentix.com> wrote: > > > > i kind of like how it is now too. > > good slidins! > > I like how it is now too - I'm talking about adding the ability to extend > a > note, in addition to tie. > Tie means that the same note is held, or different notes are overlapped. > Extend would mean that the first note would be held over multiple steps, > even though the note values for subsequent steps may be different. > The advantage of extending a note would be that if you turned off the > extend > on following steps, the original note values are still there. > It may be that this is a more sensible use of the 'X' row than the current > 'transpose defeat' thing. > > Best regards, > Colin Fraser > Sequentix Music Systems Ltd > http://www.sequentix.com > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] individual step note lengths?
2007-10-13 by josh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.