Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Message

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: v4 vs v3

2008-02-08 by Nick Rothwell

Regarding looping and suchlike, here's one of my thoughts on the P4  
memory management.

I like the idea of cloning, but it seems to me that it happens at too  
high a level (i.e. it includes all the patterns in a part, plus the  
loop information). I would prefer it to happen purely at the pattern  
level, so that different parts could refer to the same pattern (rather  
than sharing at the part level).

But (i) this is probably a big change, and (ii) maybe it's just me.

> The previous run didn't quite sell out either - I got sidetracked by  
> a new
> addition to the family.

You mean the P4?

Oh: *that* kind of addition to the family. If so: congratulations!

	-- N.


Nick Rothwell / Cassiel.com Limited
www.cassiel.com
www.myspace.com/cassieldotcom
www.last.fm/music/cassiel
www.reverbnation.com/cassiel
www.linkedin.com/in/cassiel
www.loadbang.net

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.