Regarding looping and suchlike, here's one of my thoughts on the P4 memory management. I like the idea of cloning, but it seems to me that it happens at too high a level (i.e. it includes all the patterns in a part, plus the loop information). I would prefer it to happen purely at the pattern level, so that different parts could refer to the same pattern (rather than sharing at the part level). But (i) this is probably a big change, and (ii) maybe it's just me. > The previous run didn't quite sell out either - I got sidetracked by > a new > addition to the family. You mean the P4? Oh: *that* kind of addition to the family. If so: congratulations! -- N. Nick Rothwell / Cassiel.com Limited www.cassiel.com www.myspace.com/cassieldotcom www.last.fm/music/cassiel www.reverbnation.com/cassiel www.linkedin.com/in/cassiel www.loadbang.net
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: v4 vs v3
2008-02-08 by Nick Rothwell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.