Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Message

Re: sequencers!!!!!!!!!!!!

2008-11-16 by duncan

>>hello, here a video from yesterday evening. I am now working, as you
can see, with 2 maq 16/3. but they are awfull to program for long
interesting and ever changing sequences. so I am looking for a new
step sequencer to add at my setup.<<

blimey, you've changed the studio a bit since that guitar workout from
'06! :-)

agreed re the maq- they only work for longer compositions if you are
constantly changing-

the pitches. this is what they really lend themselves to- hands-on,
with both hands! & playing through some sort of force-to-scale
mechanism. we used to use special patches in a sampler, then custom
tuning tables in the emu proteus modules, & now the p3 is used to
process (& sometimes capture) the maq's output.

the row lengths. we use an external midi controller to adjust the
loop-point of each row. we don't alter the start point often, as it
can get hard to remain syncopated.

the timbres. use midi controllers & the maq itself to alter anything
you can address by midi-CC.

try chaining the rows together to make longer sequences. we have done
this a few times, but I noticed that the maq will tend to crash if any
row in a chain is in random mode...

you could also set the two maqs up to interfere with each other. I
have three of them- I really ought to try that next time two of them
are in the same studio.... :-)

but yes, you need to get a p3! it has the immediacy of the maq, if you
set it up right (i.e. knob-grab events, keyboard input...) but the
depth of... well.... actually I don't think there is another machine
in hardware or software that achieves the same as the p3.

duncan/r.m.i.

(p.s. did you enjoy the eindhoven experience?)

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.