one of the hardware box I've talked about... Am 20.11.2008 um 23:15 schrieb peter sedin: > yes i have a syncshift mark2 unit! it`s supernice! with this i can > offset midiclock start for any device i want to.. i use a sort of > loopsurfing device.. but can also be used to send dinsync if you > like.. > it can of course also be used to correct midiclock delays from a > computer sending midi to extrernal gear. > or the other way around > i love it.. > > hysham2000 <isham@hispeed.ch> wrote: HI , > > I've learned many things on timing on this site, does someone know > these products (I received a very quick and nice answer from the > owner) ? > > http://web.webhost4life.com/innerclock/index.asp?action=page&name=16 > > --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, henry stamerjohann > <audio@...> wrote: > > > > Hi robin, > > > > internal of a software host with instruments or standalone of a > > software you won't have such timing problems if > > the developers make sure plugins follow the internal tempo exactly > > (its a C function allowing things like sample accurate triggering) > so > > that is no point of discussion. > > tempo is calculated by the CPU (intel, AMD, PPC) in PPQ and often > runs > > interpolated so you have higher increments, good hosts get locked > with > > the audio card driver so the clock can > > be stable internally up to a certain degree (ASIO, Cora Audio) so > no > > timing problems need to happen for this DAW integrated system of > host > > + plugin-instruments, > > I didn't made a statement against this. > > > > BUT as soon as you start to use the midi engine and try going > outside > > of the CPU (classic midi, USB, ethernet) getting tight tempo is a > > problem, so is the groove. you have some significant jitter to > deal > > with so sooner or later the dtempo drifts and things run out of > sync. > > > > do your homework and read about timing with computer software > topic > > carefully in the web. > > the short summary is since AtariST all following mac/windows CPU > > calculated tempos are not tight any more, > > due to the multitasking/multithreading CPU architecture its not > > possible to achive that goal for developers and they don't adress > this > > as priority issue either > > as the most users don't notice anyway as they do everything in the > > box, also the possibilities of modern DAW will give you many other > > advantages in music production > > but they are definitely not the holy grail of groove and thight > tempo. > > > > people like Colin and other hardware developers building > > stepsequencers / grooveboxes etc. craete dedicated hardware for > the > > purpose > > of better timing and quality groove combined with a tactical > hardware > > interface. > > as soon as you try using the common available protocols > (midiclock, > > MTC) your sync sucks - somtimes you can ignore this often you can't > > if you have TR909, TR808, MPCs and want them synced well to a > current > > DAW. > > > > seems you haven't tried the above for yourself and thats OK but > don't > > expect a Software emulating the P3 or similar will perform equal > to > > the real device, > > as soon as its triggering midi hardware it will show its weakness- > a > > dedicated hardware device will perform better period. > > > > the most accurate way of syncing a DAW with midi hardware a > wordclock > > and SMPTE is required , only some MPCs have this feature, or you > need > > a special device inserted > > (Atari ST with Notator, innerclock sync-shift etc.) to manually > > compensate offset and have a low jitter constant clock. > > > > cheers, > > henry > > > > > > > > but if you want to replace a dedicated hardware sequencer > > > > > > > > Am 20.11.2008 um 14:42 schrieb Robin: > > > > > If what you are saying about software vs hardware were true - how > do > > > you > > > explain Ableton Live? > > > > > > Seems to keep excellent tempo while in control of a multitude of > VST > > > instruments - in and out midi streams and many tracks of audio... > > > > > > Todays computers tweaked for music performance are very good at > > > multitasking > > > and can emulate hardware very well. > > > > > > I run three computers and three copies of Live - al tempo synced > via > > > midi - > > > to a nord electribe - solid as can be. My P3 is SLAVED to this > > > system... > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Hardware vs Software
2008-11-20 by henry stamerjohann
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.