hi, > I bought myself a MAM SQ16 in a fit of desperation a few weeks ago i had a good hard look at this one myself, and a friend of mine has one; his comment was that it's good because it's an analog-style sequencer but that there's a lot to be improved. which will probably never happen as the unit's out of production and MAM have been bought up by Terratec by now. and of course it doesn't measure up to a P3.. > It can do pretty much everything > except send patch changes and controllers > I dunno, being able to send at least one controller per track would > add a lot of 'expressiveness' to the pattern. with the gear i'm using at the moment the P3 is the ideal everything- sequencer for me. if i could only have double the amount of tracks..and guess what should be on the way come 2004...:)
Message
Re: Schrittmacher Sequencer
2003-12-29 by ch.³l
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.