On Wednesday 07 January 2004 18:44, Colin f wrote: > > Cool. :) > > Leffe? Alfa? Duvel? > > I meant 'add anything' in the context of software. > If I had to start beta testing continental beers, the > development process might slow to a crawl. Lol! So you *know* these brands! :) I still have some Leffe Dubbel in the fridge. Great stuff. > > > Well, I was thinking about an *option* using #ifdefs in > > the source tree. You could provide a binary in a number > > of optional configs, like the bigger screen, extra mode > > LEDS, whatever. It's more work, I know, but it would be > > nice to allow for different hw configs. > > When P4 comes along, I'll go feature-mental. > And charge more ;-) Hey! ;) > For values that are selected using the step keys, it > would make sense to have some sort of cyclic light show > to indicate the keys are just gagging to be touched. I > know certain people who I'm sure would like that. Yes, lightshow, cool! :) There's the risc however that the live P3 user will simply stop performing, completely focussed on the LED show, heh. > Values that use inc/dec softkeys are all shown as such > above the F1/F2 softkeys. That should be easy enough to > remember. A little flashing symbol in the display to show > the data knob wants to see some action should help you > out. Yes, that would be great. > I've actually only just looked at how to do the user > defined characters on the display, and it's dead easy. And this works for both the old LCD and the OLED screens? > Anyone for spinning knob icons ? ;-) Well, give it a try. ;) > > Is it much work/code to have the Data knob alsways work > > for all params? > > Can't tell until I've done it. > But I think it could be counter-productive for some > parameters where data knob movement between steps would > be very large. You mean because you only have a few values to 'spread' over the full knob range? I think I wouldn't mind that. The fact that it simply always works would make it very useful, I think. I may even go for a larger knob then. > The forgotten TBI was to have the LEDs switch to a single > amber LED showing the last step while the 'last' softkey > was held. I think that makes more sense. Think so too. I was actually looking for some kind of visual clue. > Since there are only 8 possible steps in a playlist, it > would in theory be possible to have one LED showing the > current playlist step in the 9 - 16 LEDs, and leave the > current track displayed in the 1 - 8 LEDs. But this might > be more confusing for practiced users. I was planning to add an extra caption to the right 8 step keys on my on panel saying "Bank 1 - 2 - 3...". I guess changing that into "Bank/Playlist Step" would surely help. - Robert
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] P3 first impressions
2004-01-07 by Robert van der Kamp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.