Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Message

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: P3 first impressions

2004-01-09 by Colin f

> Not me,
> It wouldn't fit in my case..
> I guess as long as the firmware will work with the older 
> ones, Im happy.
> But I really don't want to have to remake the case or miss 
> out on future
> updates because they wouldn't work with my hardware.

That's what puts me off the idea most.
I'm thinking if and when I find the time to do a P4, it would be a
no-brainer, but there would have to be a majority of P3 users in favour
of a hardware extension of that sort to justify it.

Maybe some 'optional' extra keys would be a better solution ?
The P3 switch matrix interface can support another five keys without
using any of the spare pins on the AUX connector. With the AUX
connector, I could add many more.
In pattern edit mode, FUNC+PLAY/EDIT will give you access to the track
mutes, but if there was an option to wire in a dedicated switch for this
function, it could simplify things.
This could work in parallel with the existing method, and would make
this option easier to implement in playlist edit too.
So, if you had another five switches on your P3, what would you want
them to do ?

Cheers,
Colin f

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.