Colin, > That's what puts me off the idea most. and I would imagine a lot of P3 owners. it would mean a lot of work and cost for them. > I'm thinking if and when I find the time to do a P4, it would be a > no-brainer, but there would have to be a majority of P3 users in favour > of a hardware extension of that sort to justify it. maybe, but to be honest I like the P3 as it is, I don't think it needs to be bigger. > Maybe some 'optional' extra keys would be a better solution ? thats ok, as long as the software isn't limited for those of us who havn't got them. > In pattern edit mode, FUNC+PLAY/EDIT will give you access to the track > mutes, but if there was an option to wire in a dedicated switch for this > function, it could simplify things. I dunno, for me at least, its not much hassle to mute a track, edit it, exit edit mode, and unmute a track. I just don't see a need for it. > This could work in parallel with the existing method, and would make > this option easier to implement in playlist edit too. > So, if you had another five switches on your P3, what would you want > them to do ? nothing to be honest, I'd rather have LEDs for the modes (edit/pattern/song/etc) Paul
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: P3 first impressions
2004-01-09 by Paul Maddox
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.