Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Message

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: P3 first impressions

2004-01-09 by Paul Maddox

Colin,

> That's what puts me off the idea most.

and I would imagine a lot of P3 owners. it would mean a lot of work and cost
for them.

> I'm thinking if and when I find the time to do a P4, it would be a
> no-brainer, but there would have to be a majority of P3 users in favour
> of a hardware extension of that sort to justify it.

maybe, but to be honest I like the P3 as it is, I don't think it needs to be
bigger.

> Maybe some 'optional' extra keys would be a better solution ?

thats ok, as long as the software isn't limited for those of us who havn't
got them.

> In pattern edit mode, FUNC+PLAY/EDIT will give you access to the track
> mutes, but if there was an option to wire in a dedicated switch for this
> function, it could simplify things.

I dunno, for me at least, its not much hassle to mute a track, edit it, exit
edit mode, and unmute a track.
I just don't see a need for it.

> This could work in parallel with the existing method, and would make
> this option easier to implement in playlist edit too.
> So, if you had another five switches on your P3, what would you want
> them to do ?

nothing to be honest, I'd rather have LEDs for the modes
(edit/pattern/song/etc)

Paul

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.